Staff Blog

スタッフブログ

Emphatic Agreement Doi

  • 2021年4月9日
  • 未分類

On this page you will find the solution for emphatic crossword puzzle chords Crossword note. This note was last seen on April 29, 2019 in the New York Times crossword puzzle. If you have another question or need additional help, please contact us or use the search/calendar field for each piece of information. Chinese emphatic phrases are commonly called shi… Buildings. Contrary to usual assumptions, de should not be analyzed as a nominalizer or as a copula in emphatic sentences. In this paper, it is argued that shi is a modal verb and the main marker of emphatic phrases, whereas it has only a secondary function, most likely as an aspect marker. Emphaticshi must not be included in the main clause of a relative clause or appear in the same clause with a WH element or a V-not-V verb, unless the WH element is highlighted or takes the V-not-V form. Shi also cannot have a c-command of WH elements or V-not-V verbs that have a range above.

The distribution of emphaticshi in the related clauses is governed by the spec-head agreement; and its distribution in terms of WH and issues A not A is taken into account on the basis of the area of highlighting the conflict that occurs when two emphatic variables have the same domain. Shi, D. The nature of Chinese emphatic phrases. J East Asian Linguis 3, 81-100 (1994). doi.org/10.1007/BF01733150 done with the emphatic crossword concordance notice? Go back to the other crossword puzzles for the New York Times crossword puzzle April 29, 2019. Teng, Shou-hsin (1979) “Remarks On Cleft Sentences In Chinese,” Journal of Chinese Linguistics 7.1, 101-114. May, Robert (1985). I thank Joseph Aoun, Bernard Comrie, James Huang, Wes Hudson, Audrey Li, Ke Zou, the audience of the East Asian linguistics workshop at the University of California, Irvine, and the Jeal referees for their comments and help.

All the remaining errors are of course mine. This is an overview of the content of the subscription, log in to check access. Julia Horvath: Focus in the Theory of Grammar and the Syntax of Hungarian, Foris, Dordrecht. Aoun, Joseph and Audrey Y. H. Li (1989) “Constituency and Scope”Linguistic Inquiry 20, 141-172. Journal of East Asian Linguistics band 3, pages81-100 (1994)Cite this article Williams, Edwin (1980) “Predication,”Linguistic Inquiry 11, 203-238. Joseph Aoun: Generalized Binding, Foris, Dordrecht. A.

A. Dragunov: “Grammatical Studies in Chinese (Aus dem Russian) The Science Press, Beijing. Noam Chomsky: Barrier, MIT Press, Cambridge. Chafe, Wallace (1979) “Givenness, Contrastiveness, Definiteness, Subjects, Topics, and Points of View,” in Charles Li (Ed.), Subject and Topic, Academic Press, New York. Huang, T.C. James (1982) Logic Relation In Chinese And Theory of Grammar, unpublished PhD dissertation, MIT. Huang, T.C. James (1991) “OnBe andHave in Chinese,” inEssays in Memory of Professor Fangkwei Li, Institute of History and Philology, Taipei. Shi, Dingxu (1992) “The Nature of Chinese WH-Questions,” ms.

University of Southern California (appears inNatural Language and Linguistic Theory). Anna Yue Hashimoto: Embedded Structures In Mandarin, P.O.L.A.